AERIAL SPRAYING WHICH RESULTS IN CLOUD COVER

AERIAL SPRAYING WHICH RESULTS IN CLOUD COVER

Sunday, April 15, 2012

WORLD DISASTERS and GLOBAL LOAN SHARKS

                                          Associated Press

The first question I ask myself when a disaster happens....is...does it appear to be from natural causes or was it orchestrated with advanced technology, for the purpose of weakening a country? The world now has access to...and or utilizes  different types of warfare, such as weather, tectonic,biological, and information warfare.Unfortunately when each new disaster occurs we need to further analyze the situation and not take it for granted that it was caused by "Mother Nature" or God's revenge, Global warming, sunspots.....etc.
Also...whenever we cannot personally measure or observe a supposed threat , we need to analyze even more.
1. What or who are the possible causes?

2. If the event was orchestrated, what would be the benefits....and to whom?

3. What are the government responses to the disaster?

4. Does the particular country have resources that are highly sought after?

5. What is the country's current and past financial relationship with The International Monetary Fund?

6. Who or what is asking for financial aid for the disaster and what are their relationships to the IMF and the United Nations...etc

7. Is the disaster part of an unnatural sequence of rapid fire events?

8. Could relocation of the population eventually be one of the goals?

9 If relocation , eventual occupation, and ownersip of resources are some of the goals, then the important question needs to be asked......"Would the enemy permanently damage the land area and the resources they wanted to take control of? In the case of Fukushima, radiation would make the land and resources uninhabitable and worthless.

10. In the case of Fukushma, if the disaster was due to geological warfare, then wouldn't precautions have been taken to assure that radiation would not become a problem?

11. If you wanted to take over land and resources after creating a disaster, would you use information warfare to convince a majority of the people to move or that their water and food supply (for example) were contaminated? If the people could be convinced that the water was contaminated with radiation, then perhaps a certain company or the government might come up with a water filtration system which supposedly would filter the water of the radiation. Of course you would have to pay for this water. A known goal of the Global Loansharks is to own the water and the food supply.

12. Is reverse psychology, information warfare, or Problem/Reaction/Solution being used? Example: Concerning Fukushima, we are told that the Japanese government and perhaps the U.S. government are keeping the seriousness of the radioactivity contamination from the people. The mainstream media is supposedly keeping this vital information from the people. The "Alternative" media is shouting from the rooftops that we are all in serious danger from this radioactivity...that it is beginning to contaminate the water and food supply here in the U.S. Wouldn't the public be more inclined to believe what they percieve to be the alternative media...over the mainstream corporate owned media? Don't you think that the orchestrators would realize this fact and infiltrate or even CREATE alot of the alternative media?

13. One would suspect that if the radiation from Fukushima was potent enough to drift over here ...via the oceans or through the atmosphere and cause the possible horrific consequences they seem to be leading us to fear....then the people of Fukushima and the cities nearby should have  been experiencing acute radiation sickness. I have seen a documentary filmed by someone I am aquainted with which shows some of the people in Fukushima showing concern at public meetings about this invisible radiation which so far apparently hasn't harmed anyone in the general population. The documentary did not show anyone with symptoms of radiation sickness. Conveniently (IF the radiation scare is a hoax, it may not be) any effects of the radiation supposedly would not show up for 10 to 30 years...and then as cancer). Any possible goal of  a perpetrator could be accomplished within that time frame. The main concern of the people in this documentary was unseen radiation that would harm the children within 10, 20 or 30 years. I saw no evidence of any kind of current sickness from radiation in the documentary. If the extent of the disaster was really as serious as they proclaim, I would think there would be observable serious evidence of it....especially right in Fukushima

14. The Global Loansharks monitor blogs and websites such as this one for the purpose of formulating their next moves. So.....out of interest....keep an eye out for new reports of people in Fukushima suffering from radiation poisoning....as their possible response to this post.
Here are symptoms of acute radiation poisoning From Medline

Causes

The causes include:
  • Accidental exposure to high doses of radiation such as a nuclear power plant accidents
  • Exposure to excessive radiation for medical treatments

Symptoms

  • Bleeding from the nose, mouth, gums, and rectum
  • Bloody stool
  • Bruising
  • Confusion
  • Dehydration
  • Diarrhea
  • Fainting
  • Fatigue
  • Fever
  • Hair loss
  • Inflammation of exposed areas (redness, tenderness, swelling, bleeding)
  • Mouth ulcers
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Open sores on the skin
  • Skin burns (redness, blistering)
  • Sloughing of skin
  • Ulcers in the esophagus, stomach or intestines
  • Vomiting blood
  • Weakness
In closing I just want to restate the idea that if  a substantial amount of radiation is really drifting over to the U.S. then this might indicate that the amount of radiation at Fukushima should be causing vast acute radiation sickness in the people over there. The video I saw of a meeting with the people and the government officials and officials from the Power Plant, showed no evidence....of current illness. Although the citizens who were there at the meeting were complaining and very concerned about possible future damage to their children especially, there was no mention whatsoever of any current illness or symptoms resulting from radiation. The DVD I watched did skip a bit so I'm not sure if there were any parts I missed.

Also...here is an email from a person who communicated with a person in Japan who lives near Fukushima
"I just posted on your blog. Also - my parents just returned from Nagoya I can not speak to the condition of the Fukushima area but the rest of the country seems to be unaffected. My dad was telling me how expensive everything was & I asked if that was due to the tsunami. He said that no, prices have always been that way & it didn't seem that life had been affected by the tsunami at all from what they saw. "

If there are real problems in Fukushima, it's not my intention to undermine any seriousness there may be. But given the world situation and this being the year of the hyped up 2012, I think we should be more vigilant and inquisitive concerning disasters and political happenings. We also need to carefully analyze any solutions that are put forth which would be touted as saving us from supposed environmental catastrophe....or to save us from "terrorism" etc.

Let's look just briefly at the recent earthquake in Indonesia. Was this a natural event or an orchestrated event? Was the fact that this earthquake did not result in a tidal wave, part of a possible plan (a warning?) or could it have been a botched attempt at another disaster? I realize that natural disasters still occur in our world but in order to determine whether or not a certain event requires more investigation, we need to examine the history of the particular country. The following link http://www.indonesia-digest.net/2551imfwb.htm explains the history of Indonesia, the desirability of its resources and the efforts of different countries to take control of it.
                                                           
                                   Jonathan Gabay | Marketing Expert | Propaganda | Branding

We are being increasingly conditioned to accept what we hear concerning advances in science and technology.We must realize that just because a scientist or govt. official anounces a new finding or a new terrorist threat...and it may be in a Journal, on TV or newspaper...that it doesn't mean that it is true. Let's take hold of our God-given intuition and reasoning abilities, which are much more reliable than media propaganda.

 

Monday, April 9, 2012

HIJACKING THE WORLD'S RESOURCES




It appears that Agenda 21 and Gorbachev's statement that the environment is the cornerstone of the New World Order....are being strategically and covertly implemented. Before I say anything more I just want to emphasize that I am not "for" nuclear power and I am NOT against respecting our environment....and I certainly do not support corporate fascism (which is heading towards a unique blend of communism, technocracy and corporatism). In fact I would like to share a mind conditioning tactic which I have observed....especially recently.

Many people realize that the rich people of the world want to take control of planet earth. They want to own the fresh water supply, the food supply, the oceans, AND the land. They realize that this could not be easily accomplished without getting the majority to go along with it.This is where David Icke's "Problem, Reaction, Solution comes into play.Two recent disasters that come to mind where this technique may be being used are the oil spill in the Gulf and with the Fukushima earthquake, tidal wave and the supposed spread of radiation from this site. Much of this ...what I consider  scare mongering..... involves causes and results that we often personally cannot see or measure.

When we watched the news about the oil spill in the Gulf, we were treated to a never ending video of oil continually gushing forth. At first I was greatly disturbed......but one day while watching this video, which was played over and over,I was suddenly overtaken by the thought that this video may very well be on continuous "replay". I realize that this is not evidence of anything but after this thought came so strongly to me, I began analyzing the news in a whole different way. Here is one of the tactics I see being used on us......

Most of us do not trust the corporations or the government....so....one way to get the public to clamor for the solutions desired by the government/corporations is to tell the public....especially through the alternative media which they own much of..... that the corporations and/or the government are not telling us the truth about something. Let's use Fukushima as a POSSIBLE example of this. I am not saying that the following is true but only that we need to consider it. Looking back again at Agenda 21 (explained in the video below) andGorbachev's goal of using the environment to usher in The New World Order (Keep An Eye On Gorbachev http://conspiracyanalyst.blogspot.com/search/label/KEEP%20AN%20EYE%20ON%20GORBACHEV ) what possible means could they use to gain control of the natural resources of earth? Scaring the population with Oil spills, supposed global warming, supposed spreading of radiation, weather disasters(and resultant tidal waves) supposedly due to global warming...etc could get the people demanding that some centralized institution or Think Tank, such as The United Nations, should take control and make global rules that we would all have to obey. Saving the World would be the purpose. But ...wait a minute...there are some questions we should be asking before we give total authority over to anyone.
1. What and /or who are  the real causes of these events and supposed consequences that we are supposed to be fearing?

2, Are these events natural or orchestrated?

3. Could there be a global goal behind these events?

4. Is reverse psychology being used on us to get us to accept what is really "their" goal?

5. Would scaring people into thinking that our water and food supply is radioactive or contaminated by an oil spill, help the rich to become richer? Could this fear mongering possibly be based on a falsehood or perhaps an exaggeration and be used to gain control over the food and water supply?

6. Are we being told by alternative media that the government and the corporations are lying to us about the severity of the contamination so that we will strongly believe that there is contamination and clamor for their solution?

I do believe that we need to be much kinder to our environment. After all it is what sustains us. I have been noticing that when trying to manipulate the public, governments/corporations use valid concerns to build THEIR goals upon...such as women's lib, gay lib, saving the environment,....etc. These are all issues that need addressing to some extent...but it's when these issues get hijacked that we should begin to get concerned. For example, I believe that women should get equal pay if they have equal aptitude. However, women's lib is being used, by the rich who are in control, to tax 2 people in the family instead of 1, to get more control of the youth, and to destroy the family.

I feel that some, if not many of our recent disasters have been orchestrated and exaggerated, and double spun, to get us to believe that the government is hiding the seriousness from us. I believe that they may be using this technique to get us to accept control over the land, the sea, the food and water supply for the health and safety of the people and the Earth. Will they soon say our fish and water are polluted so we will need some sort of corporate filtering system to be able to drink and water our crops? Will we have total implementaion of fish farming instead of also having access to wild caught fish? Think of ways that the rich could gain if we were falsely told that these disasters are real, caused by global warming and will eventually poison us. Global environmental taxes to make the rich richer might be just one result.

You may want to check out some of the other articles on this blog to get the bigger picture concerning this issue. Are the ice caps really melting? If so, WHY are they really melting? Are weapons in space playing a role in this melting of the ice caps, in the formation of crop circles, and in the tremendous increase in our severe weather disasters? I certainly don't have all the answers....BUT....I do have plenty of questions! Whenever we are told to fear and act on something we cannot see or measure....such as Bird Flu or SARS, Swine Flu, invisible radiation, spreading oil that no one really sees in their areas, global warming ( if true....which could be due to star wars weaponry)....oh...and don't forget terrorism, think about how the rich can get richer and more powerful through this possible deception. Let's put on our thinking caps and turn off the propaganda. Remember Gorbachev says that the environment is the cornerstone (fear inducing factor?) of The New World Order.