Sunday, June 26, 2011


The Winfield Sky Blue cigarette package is a prime example of chemtrail subliminals. These cigarettes are produced by British American Tobacco and are very popular in Australia and New Zealand. British American Tobacco is the world's most international tobacco group.

Wouldn't you think that because a company named a brand of their cigarettes "Sky Blue"...that they would advertise with a clear blue sky and not a sky mostly covered with jet emissions? Those are certainly not naturally occurring clouds in the picture above. Advertising is used to promote products but when a company is owned by global interests, which consist of economic and military components, there may also be other motives to their subliminal messages. Keep in mind that advertising is a science.All images in advertising have a very specific purpose.

 It is becoming more and more obvious that there is a concerted effort to conditon people to think that jet chemtrails are the same thing as normal jet contrails....and that it is normal for these emissions to linger for hours and spread out and thicken into dense cloud cover. These jet emisson subliminals are included in cartoons, the news, game shows, car advertisements...etc. Why?

Chemtrails have pretty much become a global reality. For those of you who are new to the idea that certain jets are emitting something else besides water vapor and normal exhaust particulates...check out the link below for more info and photos on this blog

Sunday, June 5, 2011


 I'm not an expert on HAARP, space weapons or military strategy but as time goes on I am learning a bit more about controlled opposition and their tactics.Every news item isn't always controlled opposition but we have to look at them this way in order to sort out the partial truths from the insinuations and lies.I'm just going to use the video below, about Leuren Moret speaking of HAARP, as an example.I'm not saying that she is lying but that regardless of what we think we still need to analyze....hence the name of this blog.

The main message of the video was that HAARP is solely responsible for the earthquakes and perhaps weather warfare. This may be true but where do the space weapons fit in? I think that needs to be a major question and that we need to demand answers. Do space weapons play a vital role and is that why there is so much talk about distract us or to just give us partial truths? As I've mentioned before we need to question space weapons (particle beam weapons) in relation to crop circles and weather/geological warfare. It's becoming fairly obvious that the world's weather events are anything but normal AND that they are not naturally occurring.

Another aspect of the video bothered me.Radiation is something we cannot see. We may be able to see yellow colored dew or rain but that can be due to many things. We need to keep our minds open. I still feel that the radiation scare is part of the psyop. I feel that it is tied in with Agenda 21 and also part of the weakening of the nations.The big question is why would any attacking entity which wanted to occupy a land or use its resouces....why would they ever want to radiate an area they desired? Controlled opposition will think of many silly answers to this question...such as well...the conquerors are aliens and radiation doesn't bother them.

Leuren advises that because radiation affects the water and the milk that we need to avoid them. Scaring us about water and milk could be paving the way towards TPTB owning the water supply. Perhaps they will claim that they have a filtration system that will take out the radiation? Just a thought.Telling the public that there is heavy radiation in certain areas could also be a way to relocate people according to any plan they may have , such as Agenda 21.

The questions we need to ask of every news item is...first...does the news item or event have any reality at all? the news item real but grossly overblown or exaggerated? Look at the videos of events very carefully to see if scenes have been changed or added. Nowadays, just because we see videos depicting events on the doesn't mean that they are real.It's being discovered that disaster scenes can be made and acted ahead of time (with actors)to have on hand to use as generic inserts for the news. Evaluate all such videos for believability and for things that don't just seem right. In addition, videos and pictures can be photoshopped.Different backgrounds can be added or removed...etc.Also, when a disaster occurs check you tube for independant videos of the event. If all you see are official videos...then more questions need to be asked.

Here is the video I am using as an example of something which needs to be analyzed

Wednesday, June 1, 2011


We need to begin speaking out about our disapproval of surveillance cameras everywhere...even in restaurants now. Privacy is being invaded. How private are we in our own homes? Do televisions have a two way capacity......sending and receiving? Are we being monitored from a screen on the wall like in the book 1984? Does your employee track your whereabouts on the road without your knowledge??? Watch the video below to see how extensively we are already being monitored. We do have a say. Check out the link at the bottom of this post to see what Homeland Security is interested in.

Why is it the goal to have a chemical sensing cell phone in everyone's pocket as it mentions in the link below? Why is Homeland Security so interested in everyone being hooked up to this chemical sensing technology? Apparently there are already tracking chips in most cell least Verizon has them. Most people what...I'm  not doing anything wrong! Whether or not you are doing anything wrong is not the point. The point is that cellphone technology is advancing everyday and not only are billions of dollars being made off the public through the public having to have the latest and the greatest but we are being stealthily  trapped by our own nonquestioning, trusting desires for the latest gadgets. As I mentioned in another article, the microchip that everyone already in their cellphones. Now they also have a feature where people can hook up their body functions to "the command center"...supposedly to monitor and protect us and to keep us healthy.How far will this all go? If our bodily functions are connected to some home base receiver....what is to keep this receiver station from transmitting signals to our bodies?

Supposedly, I guess, in order to thwart chemical attack....the DHS is very interested in everyone having a chemical sensor. They must be worried about our health and or the danger of chemical warfare. If this is so...then why don't they just have chemical sensors in the environment of the more susceptible areas of attack, such as the cities. It seems to me that they must have a reason for wanting this "chemical detection system" attached to every person. Is it a matter of tracking people..even though they can already do this....or would this technology detect many activities we are taking part in by detecting specific compounds or chemicals? This may sound far fetched but computor and cell phone technology is already far fetched and very advanced. We take it for granted...but how on earth does it work? The link below is an article about this subject on the DHS website.